NORTH CAROLINA . The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday overturned a lower court ruling that said the Republican-led state legislature engaged in unconstitutional partisan gerrymandering when it redrew congressional districts to its advantage in 2016. ..…
The League of Women Voters, one of the in the case, pointed out that GOP had even split Democratic Greensboro so that half of the dorms at black North Carolina A&T State University were put in one Republican district, and in another.. ..…
WASHINGTON The Supreme Court completes its term Thursday with major decisions expected on partisan gerrymandering and Trump administration's plan to add citizenship question to the 2020 census.. ..…
WASHINGTON divided Supreme Court ruled Thursday that federal courts may not intervene to block even the election maps drawn by state lawmakers, decision that allows such gerrymandering to continue unabated.. ..…
The 5-4 opinion by Chief Justice John Roberts and joined by the court's other conservatives said election maps drawn by North Carolina Republicans and Maryland Democrats are constitutional despite their one-sided nature.. ..…
Republican Representative Virginia Foxx of North Carolina, ranking member of the committee, defended RFRA as a valuable means of defending religious freedom. . ..…
The court rejected challenges to Republican-drawn districts North Carolina and Democratic district Maryland.. ..…
Supreme Court had also sent back North Carolina case last term, had the legal standing to bring the challenge. David Lewis, Republican of North Carolina General Assembly, addressing fellow legislators when they passed the in 2016.. ..…
The court rejected challenges to Republican-drawn districts North Carolina and Democratic district Maryland... ..…
And the cases on which the court ruled on Thursday involved one Democratic gerrymander (Maryland) and one Republican one (North Carolina). . ..…
House of Representatives and North Carolina, they used the same tactics to isolate and limit Democratic power, and maximize their own... ..…
The justices, in decision with the court's in the majority and liberals in dissent, sided with Democratic legislators Maryland and Republican lawmakers North Carolina. ... In North Carolina case, U.S. The lower court had decided that..…
Supreme Court ruled Thursday that challenges to election districts drawn to benefit political party are political issue beyond the reach of federal courts.. ..…
Federal judges have no license to reallocate power between the major political parties, with no plausible grant of in Constitution, and no legal standards to limit and direct their decisions... ..…
In North Carolina, group of Democrats and nonprofits accused Republican majority of carving up voting districts in such way that Democrats had little chance of ever regaining control of the state, even in national wave elections.. ..…
The ruling, which rejected challenges against congressional maps in Maryland and North Carolina, was decided by a 5-4 vote, with all justices appointed by Republican presidents in the majority and those appointed by Democrats dissenting. ..…
In North Carolina case, U.S. The lower court had decided that Republican-drawn districts were so politically biased that they violated the rights of voters under U.S. ..…
In North Carolina, Republican leaders admitted they drew election map for partisan advantage and sought to lock victory for 10 of 13 congressional districts... ..…
The court rejected challenges to Republican-drawn districts North Carolina and Democratic district Maryland.. ..…
Opponents of the citizenship question hoped, however, that the discovery of a 2015 memo from a Republican operative with ties to the Trump administration might sway the court. The memo, written by late North Carolina consultant Thomas B. Hofeller, detailed how a citizenship question..…
Most controversial news of the day, as detected by AI.