u.s. v. moreno ornelas
. & P. 393, 393 (observing that where 'a gang of poachers attack[ed] a game-keeper, and le[ft] him senseless on the ground,' the 'one of them [who] return[ed] and st[ole] his money' was guilty of robbery even if he and the others had attacked only to 'resist the keeper[`]s' efforts at preventing..…