Republican legislators appealed to Supreme Court, which ordered the lower court to take new look at whether the plaintiffs have standing to sue in light of the in Wisconsin case.. ... In Maryland case, Steven Sullivan, Maryland solicitor general, which agrees that Supreme Court should..…

So advocates who want these changes may need to engage with electoral politics or the state courts regardless of how the Supreme Court rules — and if the justices do, once again, decline to rule gerrymandering unconstitutional and set a standard, expect states to become the new ground zero..…

three-judge panel of the court, however, said that Supreme Court's 1976 in Federal Energy Administration v. Algonquin SNG had already decided that Section 232 met the intelligible principle standard because the scope of the law was limited to issues of national security.. ..…

Justice Kennedy stood in the middle, for years hemming and hawing about the possibility of finding a standard to review claims of partisan gerrymandering. . . But now, with the addition of Justice Kavanaugh, the Supreme Court has shifted to the right. ..…